CENTRE V SECONDARY FUND L.P.

   Nursing Homes Affiliated with CENTRE V SECONDARY FUND L.P.

Table below shows each skilled nursing home that CENTRE V SECONDARY FUND L.P. is associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid uses nine categories to indicate how owners and managers are affiliated with skilled nursing facilities: 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Mortgage Interest, 5% Or Greater Security Interest, Director, Managing Employee, Officer, Operational/managerial Control, and Partnership Interest. These categories are shown in the table below.

NursingHomeDatabase offers data exports as Excel spreadsheets or APIs for companies or individuals that need ownership information for more than one facility. Prices vary; use the Data Request page to inquire.

Skilled Nursing Facility	Description
Arbor Rehabilitation and Nursing Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 149 LODI, CA Ranking: #9 out of 25 (Ranking List)
Buena Vista Care Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 150 SANTA BARBARA, CA Ranking: #8 out of 8 (Ranking List)
Carson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 73 CARSON CITY, NV Ranking: #11 out of 12 (Ranking List)
Catered Manor Nursing Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 83 LONG BEACH, CA Ranking: #310 out of 373 (Ranking List)
Courtyard Health Care Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 112 DAVIS, CA Ranking: #30 out of 51 (Ranking List)
Encinitas Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 99 ENCINITAS, CA Ranking: #35 out of 74 (Ranking List)
Gilroy Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 134 GILROY, CA Ranking: #7 out of 46 (Ranking List)
Grant Cuesta Sub-Acute and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 102 MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA Ranking: #86 out of 107 (Ranking List)
Huntington Park Nursing Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 99 HUNTINGTON PARK, CA Ranking: #169 out of 417 (Ranking List)
La Jolla Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 161 LA JOLLA, CA Ranking: #59 out of 79 (Ranking List)
Los Altos Sub-Acute and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 152 LOS ALTOS, CA Ranking: #81 out of 103 (Ranking List)
Mission Skilled Nursing and Subacute Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 133 SANTA CLARA, CA Ranking: #37 out of 96 (Ranking List)
Pacific Coast Manor Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 99 CAPITOLA, CA Ranking: #12 out of 45 (Ranking List)
Pacific Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 188 FRESNO, CA Ranking: #2 out of 33 (Ranking List)
Pacific Hills Manor Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 99 MORGAN HILL, CA Ranking: #19 out of 54 (Ranking List)
Palo Alto Sub-Acute and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 66 PALO ALTO, CA Ranking: #72 out of 136 (Ranking List)
Royal Care Skilled Nursing Ctr Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 98 LONG BEACH, CA Ranking: #244 out of 357 (Ranking List)
Shoreline Care Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 193 OXNARD, CA Ranking: #17 out of 18 (Ranking List)
Silver Hills Health Care Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 155 LAS VEGAS, NV Ranking: #16 out of 42 (Ranking List)
Silver Ridge Healthcare Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 148 LAS VEGAS, NV Ranking: #36 out of 42 (Ranking List)
St Edna Subacute and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 144 SANTA ANA, CA Ranking: #204 out of 299 (Ranking List)
Turlock Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 144 TURLOCK, CA Ranking: #13 out of 29 (Ranking List)
Valle Vista Post Acute Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 59 ESCONDIDO, CA Ranking: #16 out of 56 (Ranking List)
Vintage Faire Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 99 MODESTO, CA Ranking: #29 out of 38 (Ranking List)
Wagner Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 152 STOCKTON, CA Ranking: #28 out of 32 (Ranking List)

Skilled nursing homes with the red icon () are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.

   Other Skilled Nursing Facilities Previously Associated with CENTRE V SECONDARY FUND L.P.

Table below shows each skilled nursing home that CENTRE V SECONDARY FUND L.P. was previously associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.

Skilled Nursing Facility	Description
Downey Post Acute Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 99 DOWNEY, CA Ranking: #179 out of 415 (Ranking List)
Jacksonville Skld Nur and Rehab Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 88 JACKSONVILLE, IL Ranking: #7 out of 9 (Ranking List)
Highland Health Care Center Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 128 HIGHLAND, IL Ranking: #13 out of 34 (Ranking List)
Cedar Ridge Health and Rehab Ctr Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 116 LEBANON, IL Ranking: #29 out of 61 (Ranking List)
Hallmark Hc of Carlinville Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 49 CARLINVILLE, IL Ranking: #9 out of 16 (Ranking List)
Sunrise Skilled Nur and Rehab Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 99 VIRDEN, IL Ranking: #6 out of 17 (Ranking List)
Hilltop Skilled Nsg and Rehab Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 108 CHARLESTON, IL Ranking: #18 out of 20 (Ranking List)
Taylorville Skld Nur and Rehab Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 96 TAYLORVILLE, IL Ranking: #4 out of 20 (Ranking List)
Aperion Care Marion LLC Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 70 MARION, IN Ranking: #44 out of 44 (Ranking List)
Eagle Point Nursing and Rehabilitation Most Recent Record: 11/01/2016 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 75 CLINTON, IA Ranking: #4 out of 20 (Ranking List)
Ennoble Nursing and Rehab Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 85 DUBUQUE, IA Ranking: #4 out of 20 (Ranking List)
Emerald Nursing and Rehabilitation Mercy Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 174 OMAHA, NE Ranking: #43 out of 48 (Ranking List)
Continuing Healthcare of Toledo Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 75 TOLEDO, OH Ranking: #41 out of 62 (Ranking List)
Edgewood Manor Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 80 PORT CLINTON, OH Ranking: #23 out of 26 (Ranking List)
Wright Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 99 FAIRBORN, OH Ranking: #39 out of 84 (Ranking List)
Villa Georgetown Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cen Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 100 GEORGETOWN, OH Ranking: #15 out of 28 (Ranking List)
Villa Springfield Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ce Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 110 SPRINGFIELD, OH Ranking: #14 out of 68 (Ranking List)
Versailles Rehabilitation and Health Care Center Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 112 VERSAILLES, OH Ranking: #18 out of 35 (Ranking List)
Capital Post Acute Most Recent Record: 11/01/2023 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 121 SACRAMENTO, CA Ranking: #35 out of 48 (Ranking List)

Skilled nursing homes with the red icon () are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.

  About the NursingHomeDatabase Skilled Nursing Owners Database

Our database of information about owners, managers, and directors of skilled nursing homes is based primarily on data provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ("CMS"). CMS updates this information eleven times a year, typically at the end of each calendar month except for December. We pull the data as soon as it is available, run through a series of data checks and calculations and make the new data available right away.

The ownership data is typically just over 155,000 records covering over 45,000 individuals and companies that either own or are managing skilled nursing homes. The number of nursing homes in the NursingHomeDatabase skilled nursing home database is just over 15,000 which suggests that most homes will have more than one owner or operator and that many individuals and companies are involved with more than one nursing home. There are nine unique roles that are reported on:

• 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST
• DIRECTOR
• MANAGING EMPLOYEE
• OFFICER
• OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
• PARTNERSHIP INTEREST

The data is based upon records submitted to CMS by the individual nursing homes. There is often a lag time between the reporting of a change and its appearance in our database.